How Hard to Swallow?

QUESTION: Are poison pills, a.k.a. shareholder rights plans, really in the interests of all shareholders?

Nov 1, 2009

THE PANEL:

Ken Chapman: a lawyer, principal in Cambridge Strategies Inc., a public policy consulting firm, and a blogger

Ron Ghitter: a businessman, former senator, former member of the Alberta legislatur

Carole Hunt: chief legal counsel and corporate secretary, Alberta Investment Management Corporation

Subscribe to The Right Call podcast
Subscribe via iTunes

This month’s audio comes from the interview that shaped the column How Hard to Swallow?

The Right Call is a rotating panel examining issues of corporate ethics. If you’d like advice on a compromising situation (no names used), send details to feedback, or login to this site and post a comment.

November 2009 Contents

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

You may also like these stories

The Right Call | Show Them the Money: Audio
Pay equity issue continues to plague Alberta’s workplaces
How far does privacy extend: Audio
QUESTION: The new employer calls asking for references and information about your past employee’s performance. The easy question may be, how much can you, or should you, disclose to the new employer? The more difficult question is how do you balance privacy rights and corporate and public rights?
By Any Name, It Smells Foul: Audio
When to Push for Productivity: Audio
QUESTION: Question: How do you get more out of your staff, and stay within the bounds of good corporate ethics?
The Working at Home Debate: Audio
QUESTION: Question: key employee with a young family wants to either work from home, or have the company provide on-site daycare. How do you respond?

Alberta Venture welcomes your comments. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy. If you see a typo or error on our site, report it to us. Please include a link to the story where you spotted the error.